• Register
Logging in Errors
All the Articles, images, and other info shared here by the community, are copyrighted to their owners. No copyright infringement is ever intended by Its Box Office, or by the community. If you have any issues with the content used, please use the feedback section to reach us.

65k questions

244k answers

296k comments

394 users

0 votes
126 views
asked in General by Set Decorator (1.6k points)
0% Accept Rate

edited by
0

The only reason BOI compared Bahubali with Chandralekha is because that movie was not outright Hindi. 5 years in the making, it was at that time the costliest Indian film & despite running for long, it didn't recover it's costs. Then they re-shot scenes in Hindi with slightly different actors from North & retained most of the footage from Tamil version.

Coming back to Kismet & Rattan. Those were ATBB's according to BOI's older data. Now when they update it, the list might change. There will be difference in it's final updated collection too. Nevertheless, they never spoke about footfalls for older films back then. It'll be tough but going by the above paragraph, they're fairly certain, footfalls of Kismet & Rattan did not do 3cr footfalls.

0

But KISMET is ATBB ,,, According to many Sources

0

They might still be. But will have to wait till BOI updating that. Or at least a separate post for ATBB or ATG alone would suffice.

They could be ATBB's & still not be the ones with high footfallsnlike Chandralekha.

1 Answer

0 votes

I think it was KL Saigal's movie that used to run for at least a decade. He died cuz of alcoholism at the age of 43 . We need to research more, we can find the fact.

answered by Set Designer (2.4k points)

Related questions

+7 votes
5 answers 204 views
+5 votes
6 answers 102 views
102 views asked Sep 3, 2014 in Movie Discussions by anonymous
...