• Register
Logging in Errors
All the Articles, images, and other info shared here by the community, are copyrighted to their owners. No copyright infringement is ever intended by Its Box Office, or by the community. If you have any issues with the content used, please use the feedback section to reach us.

65.5k questions

246k answers


710 users

+1 vote

According to BOI Salman is the no1 star of this decade while SRK was the no 1 Star of previous decade, let's compare Best phase both the Megastars

ALL TIME BLOCKBUSTER        1         0
Blockbuster        9         4
Blockbuster%      64.3%      18.2%
Biggest Hit of the Year        5         2
Highest Footfalls(in Cr) BB=3.54 K3G=3.12
2Cr+ Footfalls       9         3
3Cr+ Footfalls       3         1
Hit%    71.4%     50%
Disasters+Flops+BE      2        8
Back to Back Blockbusters       5        2
Back to Back BHOTY       3        0
Average Footfalls     2.18cr      1.11cr

asked in Box Office Related by Camera Operator (9k points)
97% Accept Rate

3 Answers

+1 vote
Best answer

Salman's run has been more dominant imo as compared to SRK. For Shahrukh there was completion from akshay , hrithik etc. For Salman it's been mostly a clear run, since Aamir does movies in a very long gap.

answered by Producer (110k points)
selected by

Akshay from 2006 onwards, but HR was there since his debut.
He was the only star last decade who gave stiff competition to SRK (2000-2008)


Akki from 2006 & HR till 2006..!!


Because HR did only 1 movie between 2006-2009 which was a good money spinner despite being banned in couple of states

+1 vote

sallu domination is visible but in last decade giving a hit was a difficult task, compare the filmography of srk with others and you ll have a better idea. also consistency is something which distinguish srk from others.

answered by Production Accountant (21.7k points)
0 votes

Compare flops/disasters of both the actors as well, to decide who was lower in his low phase.......

answered by Unit Manager (30.6k points)