We all know what's the problem of SRK. from couple of years he has given some of weakest film of his career. neither liked by critics, audience or even fans.
he has been shedding stardom with each movie but still he is one of biggest, almost all trade site considered him ahead Aamir, may be that changed couple of months ago. still boi doesn't change their opinion. from Ra 1 to jthj he has expensed his stardom a lot. still he is top star with continuous good opening instead worst case scenario. it's kingdom of stardom actually. how much he gained before 2010 is unimaginable.
coming to point about giving big grosser, CE was just average movie, somehow liked by audience and its straight headed for highest grosser of all time that too with six days of full capacity.
2.0 is others film, here's laziness of srk about script won't effect anything. he is part or not movie is still same with Aamir /Salman /him, because all three would get the same role, bigger than akshay is playing now.
BB2 did ginormous 500cr, don't say a Salman or Aamir could have add more, it did massive it could. it's already crossed the boundaries of potential. if a prabhas can do that without any Bollywood face, we should not really think about who's face from Aamir /Salman /srk.
after so many advantages and more than excellent wom Salman failed to give highest grosser of all time, it's just fate and eid, holidays played For him while contradictory for SRK.
it's foolishness adding here srk and saying he would do half of others
with SRK movie would do 450cr if good as 1st part. with Salman and Aamir 50cr less.