Logging in Errors
Top 25 Most Active Users this Month:
  1. Ajay - 473 points
  2. Intense - 434 points
  3. SSk - 337 points
  4. Vivek Rai - 318 points
  5. TIGER- the real king - 298 points
  6. Roman - 229 points
  7. God Father - 224 points
  8. shah - 215 points
  9. THUNDER BIRD - 215 points
  10. suraj.j - 208 points
  11. Suhas - 188 points
  12. Rancho - 181 points
  13. khiladi..mass - 147 points
  14. Bollywood_on_d_Rocks - 139 points
  15. THE_KING_KHAN - 130 points
  16. Charlie Jatinder - 126 points
  17. Rocsky - 125 points
  18. Tom Cruise - 123 points
  19. nitesh singh - 99 points
  20. IamRaj - 99 points
  21. playboy - 93 points
  22. Seinfeld - 81 points
  23. devendran - 80 points
  24. Jordan Garcia - 60 points
  25. Sanal - 59 points
All the Articles, images, and other info shared here by the community, are copyrighted to their owners. No copyright infringement is ever intended by Its Box Office, or by the community. If you have any issues with the content used, please use the feedback section to reach us.

67.1k questions

253k answers


1.1k users

+3 votes

Quiet for a week since KJo, Varun, Saif took digs at her at New York award show, then issued apologies for tasteless ‘nepotism rocks’ joke, Kangana Ranaut replies to Saif’s open letter with her own

All the debate and exchange of thoughts on nepotism is exasperating, but healthy. While I enjoyed some of the perspectives on this subject, I did find a few disturbing ones. This morning, I woke up to one such open letter (circulating online), written by Saif Ali Khan.

The last time I was deeply pained and upset about this issue was when Mr Karan Johar wrote a blog on it, and even once declared in an interview that there are many criteria for excelling in film business. Talent is not one of them.

I don't know if he was being misinformed, or simply naïve, but to discredit the likes of Mr Dilip Kumar, Mr K Asif, Mr Bimal Roy, Mr Satyajit Ray, Mr Guru Dutt, and many more, whose talent and exceptional abilities have formed the spine of our contemporary film business, is absolutely bizarre.

Even in today's times, there are plenty of examples where it has repeatedly been proven that beyond the superficiality of branded clothes, polished accents, and a sanitised upbringing, exists grit, genuine hard-work, diligence, eagerness to learn, and the gigantic power of the human spirit. Many examples, all over the world, in every field, are a testimony to that. My dear friend Saif has written a letter on this topic and I would like to share my perspective. My request is that people must not misconstrue this and pit us against each other.

This is just a healthy exchange of ideas, and not a clash between individuals.

Saif, in your letter you mentioned that, “I apologised to Kangana, and I don't owe anyone any explanation, and this issue is over.” But this is not my issue alone.

Nepotism is a practice where people tend to act upon temperamental human emotions, rather than intellectual tendencies.

Businesses that are run by human emotions and not by great value-systems, might gain superficial profits.

However, they cannot be truly productive and tap into the true potential of a nation of more than 1.3 billion people.

Nepotism, on many levels, fails the test of objectivity and rationale. I have acquired these values from the ones who have found great success and discovered a higher truth, much before me. These values are in the public domain, and no one has a copyright on them.

Greats like Vivekananda, Einstein and Shakespeare didn't belong to a select few. They belonged to collective humanity. Their work has shaped our future, and our work will shape the future of the coming generations.

Today, I can afford to have the willpower to stand for these values, but tomorrow, I might fail, and help my own children realise their dreams of stardom. In that case, I believe that I would have failed as an individual. But the values will never fail. They will continue to stand tall and strong, long after we are gone.

So, we owe an explanation to everyone who either owns, or wants to own these values. Like I said, we are the ones who will shape the future of the coming generations.

In another part of your letter, you talked about the relationship between genetics and star kids, where you emphasised on nepotism being an investment on tried and tested genes. I have spent a significant part of my life studying genetics. But, I fail to understand how you can compare genetically hybrid racehorses to artistes!

Are you implying that artistic skills, hard-work, experience, concentration spans, enthusiasm, eagerness, discipline and love, can be inherited through family genes? If your point was true, I would be a farmer back home. I wonder which gene from my gene-pool gave me the keenness to observe my environment, and the dedication to interpret and pursue my interests.

You also spoke of eugenics -- which means controlled breeding of the human race. So far, I believe that the human race hasn't found the DNA that can pass on greatness and excellence. If it had, we would've loved to repeat the greatness of Einstein, Da Vinci, Shakespeare, Vivekananda, Stephen Hawking, Terence Tao, Daniel Day-Lewis, or Gerhard Richter.

You also said that the media is to be blamed, since it is the real flag-bearer of nepotism. That makes it sound like a crime, which is far from the truth. Nepotism is merely a weakness of the human nature; it takes great deal of will-power and strength to rise above our intrinsic nature -- sometimes we excel, sometimes we don't. No one is putting a gun to anyone's head to hire talent they don't believe in. So, there is no need to get defensive about one's choices.

In fact, the subtext of all my talk on this subject has been to encourage outsiders to take the path less travelled. Bullying, jealousy, nepotism and territorial human tendencies are all part of the entertainment industry, much like any other. If you don't find acceptance in the mainstream, go off beat -- there are so many ways of doing the same thing.

I think the privileged are the least to be blamed in this debate, since they are part of the system, which is set around chain reactions. Change can only be caused by those who want it. It is the prerogative of the dreamer who learns to take his or her due, and not ask for it.

You are absolutely right -- there is a lot of excitement and admiration for the lives of the rich and famous. But at the same time, our creative industry gets this love from our countrymen, because we are like a mirror to them -- whether it's Langda Tyagi from Omkara, or Rani from Queen, we are loved for the extraordinary portrayal of the ordinary.

So, should we make peace with nepotism? The ones who think it works for them can make peace with it. In my opinion, that is an extremely pessimistic attitude for a Third World country, where many people don't have access to food, shelter, clothing, and education. The world is not an ideal place, and it might never be. That is why we have the industry of arts. In a way, we are the flag-bearers of hope.
Source Link: http://m.mid-day.com/articles/kangana-ranaut-reply-farmer-comment-saif-ali-khan-karan-johar-varun-dhawan-dig-iifa-awards-2017/18443159
in Movies by All Time best! (257k points)
99% Accept Rate

5 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

she is right. Saif has been in the industry for so long, how could he make that stupid joke, and then say sh*t like this in an interview.

and yes, nepotism does exist, without we won't have mahan actors like Arjun, Tiger, Shraddha, etc...

by Assistant Director (44.2k points)
selected by
+2 votes

Kangana has the habit of pinching each and every co-star. From recent times what i see she has bitter relation with almost every co-star. It does prove either she is mentally ill or she is dumb. Why she need to take it on to every male co-star when other actresses are working happily. Kangana has some sort of disorder. She thinks herself as the face of so called feminism. Hastala vista kangana. With this you just marked the end of your not so gracious career.

by Second Unit Director (76.3k points)

Either Kangana is a b!tch or all these stars r male chauvinist ..kangana has a hot body.. So I will support her.


Charlie bhai last line khatarnak tha. Rofl.


Greek bhai, she plays the victim card, that is how she used cheap tactics to frame hrithik roshan, earlier ajay and sanju were also trapped by her.

Her time is done now, attention seeking arrogant woman is going down now, very fast


'Misandry' is the word i found after googling

+1 vote

Okay alright enough
Will kangana stop this bullshit of nepotism
Yess it is in bollywood everyone knows it no need to stretch the topic
Man she is talented but is damn irritating
Only nepotism doesn't mean you are going to be a star
Ex are too many
If there was so much nepotism you won't be in bollywood

by Unit Manager (36.3k points)
+1 vote

Now this topic is getting stretched too much. Earlier she had negative image because of her behavior with almost everyone but suddenly after this nepotism incident people are calling her Queen of Bollywood, ideal woman, perfect role model,female superstar and what not.

by Production Accountant (21.7k points)
+1 vote

I agree nepotism does exist and we have many wonderful byproducts of it such as ranbir, tiger, arjun, etc etc.

Kangana using this as a tool to revive her sinking career, after twmr became a hit, she thought she can make every film run on her own steam, and she herself ran out of steam this year with rangoon.

Desperate woman, she will be finished in the next year or so.

by Director (127k points)

u r such a positive guy.....wish the same for Ranbir

Related questions

+6 votes
1 answer 56 views
56 views asked Jun 5, 2014 in Opinion by Mast Maula Assistant Director (48k points)
+2 votes
2 answers 216 views
216 views asked May 15, 2016 in General by Kabir Production Accountant (27.1k points)